View Single Post
Old 03-15-2004, 06:58 PM  
xenigo
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally posted by charlie6763


I'm guessing the cost per GB on the 200's are a lot less than the cost per GB on the 300's!
Exactly. I bought two 160gb SATA drives because they were the lowest cost per gig drive on the market.
xenigo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote