Rob Roy,
I can see your point I realy do, but I do not agree 100%
I see it like this:
When established sites like Superchicken start doing things like this, that might be taken as a signal to a lot of up and comming TGP's that were basically good to follow his lead, and that in turn is simply bad for business.
In that regard I think it is very important to discuss it like is happening here on the popular boards.
Not only does it give the webmasters using the services of a TGP the chance to show how they feel, it enables us to communicate with the TGP owners publicly, and with that provide grounds to observe the different points of view.
I think it's important to all webmasters, but specialy the starting webmasters.
On a personal note:
I allready stated that it's not so much the rules I object to as to the bogus explaination that it's for the greater good.
I appreciate it in a webmaster when he's upfront and tells it like it is.
This particular change is about money nothing more, it's not for the greater good for the submitting webmaster, it's for the greater good of the chicken's wallet, which would be fine with me if he would just be honest about that and not try to feed me a bogus cock and bull story about that this would be better for all webmasters submitting, because it's not.
Wolfshade
------------------
Get paid per minute!
Dialerclopedia