View Single Post
Old 05-07-2001, 02:08 PM  
wolfshade
Confirmed User
 
wolfshade's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The right place
Posts: 847
First off I welcome this discussion I think that's a good thing. I mean I can dish out on matters I think are wrong but I also am man/wolf enough to admit the good things

But I'm sorry to say what you are stating holds no water in my opinion.

Let me raise just a few points:

Webservers are webservers no matter if they are freehost servers or paid host servers, so if you can crash my server with a movie page on it you would also do that to freehosts, so just allowing freehosts for movies is still hypocrite in my opinion, for a number of reasons:

1) I do not believe in half methods either you ban freehosts or you allow then. I seriously doubt though that you would get any movie posts if you didn't allow them on freehosts so I think my asumption from the former posts still stands.

2) You require a password now so you give submitting webmasters a certain "trusted" status so it shouldn't even matter wether they are on free or paid hosting. I think it's more a matter of more outgoing links on a gallery(headers and footers from the freehost) means less surfers click back to your TGP which means less chances of a sale.

3) Yes I've seen you change a lot and yes I agree change is a good thing but I've seen you change back to the old situation just as often so that tells me your experimenting, which in turn tells me you have no solid way of making that TGP work for you. You can run all the companies you like, hell you might be the next Bill Gates for all I care and make millions I still say that on that TGP you're loosing $$$ and that is the reason for the change in rules.

4) you state:
Quote:
I think of Superchicken like my son. I'm not a bad dad but instead a dad with values who likes to make it easier for webmasters who want to make money.
How does forcing your webmasters to use a sponsor that converts poorly and that's not just my experience but from more then 400!!! webmasters I asked about it, that's goo dthing of running one of the larger webmaster resources sites, you get a large webmaster base.

Why not allow the webmasters to make the money by using the sponsors of their choice not yours. You can't deny that's a money thing and only there to fill your pockets daddy!

The above are just points I make from A) my observations and B) your own remarks.

Now from a point of ethics and loyalty to your webmasters

On the other hand do you remember what started your TGP off? right! your slapping those sources in the face right now! And that's including all thos estarting webmasters that sent you goo dclean galleries but just don't have the $$$ yet for paid hosting because they have spent it on content TGP's like yours thrive upon. Your slapping them in the face too.

And last but now least I ask again how come MUCH larger TGP's then yours like The Hun and Worldsex don't have to make the webmasters jump through hoops like you do.

I think it's save to asume they have the marketing for their sites under control and you don't.

Just my observation, if I"m wrong please do enlighten me.

I'm not so thickheaded that I"m not open to listen to another point of view, but nobody will ever accuse me of being subtile or diplomatic either I call em as I see em and think that's a good thing.

Wolfshade



------------------
Get paid per minute!
Dialerclopedia
wolfshade is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote