|
I'm 12 credits short of an MSEE and some of my Profesors worked in the Space program, whats more a couple of the people I've worked with along the way have worked at Nasa.This doesn't make me a Scientific genious or anything but some of these folks talk about the work they did.They don't say things like "yeah we had to digitally enhance the photo to make it look like there was no wind", they say things like "we had to use custom designed electrolytic capacitors on the output of our power supplies in order to get the equivalent series resistance below .oo1 ohms,thats the only way to keep the ripple on a 100khz/300W swith mode power supply below 1 mv peak to peak".If you think that I am blowing sophisticated smoke at you then go spend 5 or 6 years in a University Enginnering Program to find out that I'm not.
In order to put forward the hypothesis that the moon landings are fake you have to be able to assume a conspiracy that would have included literally millions of people.NONE OF WHOM EVER CAME FORWARD AND REVEALED THE TRUTH.Give me a fucking break.
The only thing going on here is that somebody figured out a way to create some controversy and make some money.Just like the Loch Ness Monster, and the old Paul is dead Beatle fans.I wonder how many of you folks who question the moon landings without even a glimmer of real science in your background are more than willing to accept the existance of ghosts,boogy monsters,and that little green men crashed out in area 51 in the Nevada desert while the US government covered it up.
Let me explain something to you about most people who work in government.THEY AREN"T THAT SMART.
|