GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

HQ · 04-02-2001, 09:37 AM

Susan,

very good points indeed. i never thought of it from the perspective that it helps you have your material copied over the internet. microsoft obviously thrives off of software piracy.

however, there must have been celebrity lawsuits over defamation and the sort... you know the britney spears blow job, etc. can't be viewed as publicity that helps.

i definitely think that you can 'get away' with using celebrity pics, i just do not want to risk my server and all my sites with anything like that right now. but there's no question that is is illegal to use this copyrighted materail.

but do you know if using celebrity names (just text, not images) is illegal?

------------------
HQ

HQ's Daily Nude
http://www.hqdailynude.com/

Traffic Trade?
http://www.hqdailynude.com/webmasters.html

Free Content?
http://www.oliver-klozov.com/cgi-bin...i?ref=hqdailyn

[This message has been edited by HQ (edited 04-02-2001).]

04-02-2001, 09:37 AM
HQ Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 3,539	Susan, very good points indeed. i never thought of it from the perspective that it helps you have your material copied over the internet. microsoft obviously thrives off of software piracy. however, there must have been celebrity lawsuits over defamation and the sort... you know the britney spears blow job, etc. can't be viewed as publicity that helps. i definitely think that you can 'get away' with using celebrity pics, i just do not want to risk my server and all my sites with anything like that right now. but there's no question that is is illegal to use this copyrighted materail. but do you know if using celebrity names (just text, not images) is illegal? ------------------ HQ HQ's Daily Nude http://www.hqdailynude.com/ Traffic Trade? http://www.hqdailynude.com/webmasters.html Free Content? http://www.oliver-klozov.com/cgi-bin...i?ref=hqdailyn [This message has been edited by HQ (edited 04-02-2001).]