GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Paris Hilton sues over video... (when not if)

ibuydomains · 02-28-2004, 07:24 PM

When it happens, could XPAYS affiliates be partially liable for advertising it? Included in the lawsuit?

Also XPAYS themselves dont have the 2257 records...

"In fulfilling its obligations under 18 U.S.C. § 2257, XPays Inc. relies on the plain language of the statute and on the well-reasoned decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Sundance Associates, Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 808 (10th Cir 1998), which held that entities which have no role in the "hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation" of the models or performers, are exempt from the record-keeping requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2257.

Therefore, 18 U.S.C. § 2257 information is available from:

Richard Salomon, Custodian of Records"

02-28-2004, 07:24 PM
ibuydomains Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 710	Paris Hilton sues over video... (when not if) When it happens, could XPAYS affiliates be partially liable for advertising it? Included in the lawsuit? Also XPAYS themselves dont have the 2257 records... "In fulfilling its obligations under 18 U.S.C. § 2257, XPays Inc. relies on the plain language of the statute and on the well-reasoned decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Sundance Associates, Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 808 (10th Cir 1998), which held that entities which have no role in the "hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation" of the models or performers, are exempt from the record-keeping requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2257. Therefore, 18 U.S.C. § 2257 information is available from: Richard Salomon, Custodian of Records"