View Single Post
Old 02-26-2004, 12:45 AM  
Roger
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MetroCity
Posts: 3,181
Quote:
Originally posted by theking
Do you think that the members of both houses of Congress that had access to and were provided with the same intel that was provided to the Administration were liars when they said that Iraq possessed WMD's and WMD programs. Do you think that the Administration would use WMD's and WMD programs as the primary public reason (not the only public reason and in my opinion not even the true primary reason) for invading Iraq...if they knew with certainty that WMD's/Programs/Materials would not be found? The people in the Administration are not that outrageously stupid.
They probably didn't expect much of the intel they where provided with to be fake in the first place. Cheney was the guy in charge of analysing raw CIA reports. What's for sure is that this administration is lying.

Quote:
The US forces are well equipped to fight and survive in a WMD scenario...and in addition WMD's...other than Nukes...are not easily deployed as an effective military weapon...bottom line their military effectivness is highly overated.
So just how exactly was Saddam an imminent threat to the US then?

But civilians aren't well equipped. Kuwaitis, Israelis, Iraqis and Iranians could've suffered high casualties.
Roger is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote