|
This is an interesting question. There's a couple different components to this. First being that she was intoxicated. Second, she consented to sex with the first two men, but didn't consent to the third. Third, she didn't know there was a third person.
First off, it can automatically be deemed rape because she was intoxicated, and may have been unable to make any decision regarding the matter. aka: she was taken advantage of by the third person, by means of being intoxicated, which is rape... regardless of whether she said no or not. She consented to the first two, but did not object to the third. I'm not sure if it can be deemed rape stricly on the basis that she didn't know she was fucking a third person. I think if she wasn't intoxicated, and didn't know there was a third person involved, it wouldn't be considered rape... but since alcohol was involved, it changes the legality quite a bit.
-Noah
|