Quote:
Originally posted by hottoddy
We don't know if it's true or untrue. The latest story just says the lady in question is denying it. That's all. What makes the denial more convincing than the allegations? Sure, Drudge is guilty of reporting stuff with minimal backup, but a simple denial doesn't make it untrue. This story is far from over.
|
I gotta disagree. If she came forward and made a statement to the contrary the issue is dead in the water.
Anything coming from the news after this disclosure is dangerously bordering on the edge of libel. No newsman worth his salt is gonna pursue it unless one of the two or both parties involved issue statements contradictory.
It looks like another case of a sig whore ( Drudge ) jumping the gun trying to reclaim past glory after the Lewinsky scandal.