Quote:
Originally posted by rooster
its not the average family man, its extremists and terroists.
appeasing terrorists just dosent work. Like in Beirut when they blew up all those marines and then the usa left. Thats exactly what they want because they know alot of the western world in its idealist sociallism dosent have the stomache for blood.
|
I thought our goal was to remove Saddam from power (though the Bush goal changed week to week..but seemed to finally settle on this scenario).
Having done that..haven't we finally reached: "Mission Accomplished!"?
And here's the old right wing argument...they is TERRORISTS! Iraq did not attack or have any part in the attack on the U.S. on 9/11. Even GW himself admitted that. So that argument doesn't fly. Even for a rooster!
You use the example of Beirut, Lebannon. So when we removed our troops there, where and when did the "terrible things" to the United States and it's allies take place? Lebannon is a relatively stable country today compared to it's past.
Sorry, still don't see any justification for keeping our troops there.