I certainly don't think it is.
Check out the Libertarian Party's stance on it... I think it's the most balanced I've seen...
http://www.lp.org/organization/histo...1996/wraa.html
In case that link doesn't work, here's the jist of it:
*************************
Recognizing that abortion is a very sensitive issue and that libertarians can hold good-faith views on both sides, we believe the government should be kept entirely out of the question, allowing all individuals to be guided by their own consciences. We oppose all restrictions on the sale of RU 486, and on the sale of menstruation-inducing contragestive pills, which block fertilized eggs from attaching themselves to the womb. We oppose legislation restricting or subsidizing women's access to abortion or other reproductive health services; this includes requiring consent of the prospective father, waiting periods, and mandatory indoctrination on fetal development, as well as Medicaid or any other taxpayer funding. It is particularly harsh to force someone who believes that abortion is murder to pay for another's abortion.
The Libertarian Party is the only sensible political party, particularly for adult webmasters.
http://www.LP.org