Quote:
Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
Where did I say that in this thread??? What's priceless is you not understanding the thread and my response to it. 
|
no you posted a link with no comment then got all prissy when people didn't cheer you on and went on about how they thought it was fake which is why you retreated into "wah, if this was the US you'd all be aggreeing with the article"
Quote:
Domestic blindness at it's best was my point in this thread. HELLO???? 
|
up to the point of my reply you had made absolutely NO POINT AT ALL execpt a little whinge that they'd agree with it if it suited what they believed.
Quote:
There are many reasons why we invaded Iraq. And it had nothing to do with the damn French. They ran away, if you remember correctly.
|
who said it had anything to do with the french? when did they "run away"? all i remember is them trying to protect their oil contracts and investments the way any country would do.
Quote:
And I will say that oil is one of the reasons. We do not want that resource in the hands of a madman. We would rather it be in the hands of the Iraqi people so they can use their resources to better their lives and help the world.
And BTW we do not care who they sale it too, they will probably sell it to the French again even though they didn't do shit to save them. Money is money!!
|
very naive but at least you accept it was one of the reasons. The US didn't invade to put the resource in the hands of the people.. lol. the US doesn't even really want them to have a real democracy - hell *I* don't want to risk them having a real democracy, they're not ready for it - it would be very close to being another islamic state if real elections were held today. Hooray we would have created another Iran. At least Saddam kept a reasonably secular state.