01-28-2004, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,917
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ThunderBalls
This:
"And given the offense of September 11, we know we could not trust the good intentions of Saddam Hussein because he didn't have any."
Uninformed people hearing or reading that statement would either consciously or subconsciously believe Saddam had something to do with 9/11.
|
Absolutely. Nothing new tough....:
Quote:
Hitler?s propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, said for propaganda to be effective it should consist of a few phrases repeated over and over again. By all accounts, Karl Rove and Condoleezza Rice are effective propagandists. They knew what to tell the White House speechwriters to solidify this connection between Hussein and 9/11.
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/m...load&sid= 503
|
Quote:
|
In speeches and press conferences given by members of the administration, the words ?9/11?, ?terrorist?, and ?Saddam Hussein? were and still are being used in close proximity to each other. White House speeches, especially the president?s are carefully written. It seems, then, that utilizing the shock and horror of those days, the administration deliberately set out to make the American people afraid of Saddam Hussein. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that the wording of the speeches was deliberately crafted so that people would come to associate the man (Hussein) with the event (9/11). Even though the speeches do not explicitly link Hussein to 9/11, the implicit meaning is clear.
|
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
|
|
|