Quote:
Originally posted by Odin88
I questioned you in my first post, and you continued along the same line anyway.
|
My line:
"the likelihood of <b>significant</b> [bold font added now] evolutionary changes and thus differences regarding intelligence is very small"
There are obvious differences we know about, and there are probably differences we don't know about as well.
But - very important - *assuming* or *believing* these differences are much larger than the ones we know about, contradict the early indications of current research and contradict findings of studies like iq tests is foolish.
It could be the case, but with our current knowledge that chance seems small. Small is not the same as non-existant. This is a discussion about likelihood, not certainty.