|
Anybody else think the US that should lower the age at which any nudity = abuse?
I mean, 16 year olds are not "children". Most 16 year olds have been having sex for quite some time, and a 16 year old girl uploading topless pics of herself is not "abuse".
In most parts of the world, throughout most of history, 16 has been a normal socially-acceptable marrying child-bearing age. Before modern medicine, that used to be almost middle aged!
I'd much rather law enforcement spend their time, money, personal, and resources going after real kiddy porn vs regulating the morals of hormonal teenagers.
Isn't calling a teenager with a webcam "child-abuse" only serving to cloud the severity of actual abuse and real criminals?
|