Quote:
Originally posted by bhutocracy
no, the minister was just as entitled to paint a picture of him destroying it as the artist was his installation, otherwise in your trite analysis the artist is validated in breaking into the ministers home and smashing his tv set as an "expression" against his "expression".
|
Actually I was trying to be sarcastic - I dont feel that someone can do anything in the name of art - that was the point of my argument, surely the Ambassador was not taking an Artistic stand towards the art work.
As far as the artist breaking into the Ambassadors house - he could - but that would be illegal art.
