Quote:
Originally posted by bhutocracy
no, the minister was just as entitled to paint a picture of him destroying it as the artist was his installation, otherwise in your trite analysis the artist is validated in breaking into the ministers home and smashing his tv set as an "expression" against his "expression".
|
Exactly, as I said, Mazel knew the piece was there. He could have protested and made a big event of "not going to the forum" because of the piece, or something like that.
Instead, he chose to go and deliberately tried to destroy it.
Its plain and simple.
he could have "protested" it in another way, but his ignorance got the best of him.
