Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch XXX
Bottom line is he was out of line.
|
Thats not the bottom line - it is only your opinion.
You are giving rights to the artist that you are taking away from the Ambassador - freedom of expression is a two way street - expression draws reaction - just because it involved the destruction of another persons property does not have to mean that it should be dismissed.
After all much art involves the destruction of other persons property - everything from Graffiti Art to much of performance art can rely on the destruction of eith public or private property to make a statement.
The bottom line changes depending on who is looking at it - you should know this, you have said that you studied art for three years - nothing is black and white, there is no bottom line.