|
I really don't see how they could try to enforce any 'continue to pay' clause in the contract..
If the patent/s are invalidated, then there is no license to pay for, so what are they paying for?
Kinda like, "Well we lost, but you have to keep paying for the Hell of it."
Further.. It seems to me, in that the contract is patent based, if it is ruled that there are no valid patents, then any contract/s pertinent to such patents would be null and void..
|