01-13-2004, 04:22 PM
|
|
|
Nice Kitty
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
|
Quote:
Originally posted by directfiesta
Some are starting to talk ( but you have to be carefull: Anti-Bush = USA hater = traitor)...
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror's Scope
By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 12, 2004; Page A12
A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat.
...
"[T]he global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously indiscriminate and ambitious, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be readjusted," Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign "is strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for absolute security."
Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military strategy and related issues, was an aide to then-Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2004Jan11.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Misleading information. This is not the official position of the War College but was an article written by Record who was visiting the War College. |
|
|