Quote:
Originally posted by arg
Galseek, you seem deadset on using flash for navigation, despite everyone's advice to the contrary, so I'm not sure why you asked here. Everyone who sets up annoying flash user interfaces thinks "oh well mine will be different," it's still damn annoying. Instead of flash with an "html" button, how about try html with a "flash" button...see how many people actually seek out a flash user interface. I can't think of a major site (google, yahoo, cnn, espn, etc.) that uses Flash for navigation. For irritating ads that are forced on users, sure thing, but not navigation.
|
1. i'm not deadset, but i like the idea... the web is going to proceed to get more animated oriented in the future, same thing happened with Pictures, to TV. the only barrier is connection speed, which WILL increase. so i'm asking on GFY (and irc) to see how others feel about it.
2. "Everyone who sets up annoying flash user interfaces", well that is applicable to people who setup ..annoying.. FUI's, mine won't be ;)
3. those major sites that don't use flash don't use it maybe because a 2% loss of traffic = a lot of $
I don't see how creating a navigation something like these two examples:
http://www.logoyes.com/index2.html
http://www.broadcom.com
could be "annoying"?