a new year, a new time to be shocked by these right wing nuts
The manifesto, presented as a "manual for victory", written by Richard Perle, a Pentagon adviser and "intellectual guru" of the hardline neo-conservative movement, and David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter.
article on
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...e&_requestid=1
their manifesto aks for
* demanding regime change in Syria and Iran
no problem with this, question is how? again an expensive war probably, which I don't agree with.
*Cuba-style military blockade of North Korea backed by planning *for a pre-emptive strike on its nuclear sites.
pre-emptive strikes on nuclear sites, yes we all know how bullet proof US strikes can be
be warned for nuclear contamination in the year 2004
*The authors urge Mr Bush to "tell the truth about Saudi Arabia". *Wealthy Saudis, some of them royal princes, fund al-Qa'eda, *they write.
something I agree with, the US still protects the royal house, which is a well known supporter of terrorism, why? D'uh, it's the biggest stable oil supplier
*Saudi Arabia and France to be treated not as allies but as rivals *and possibly enemies.
for Saudi look above
*tough action against France and its dreams of offsetting US *power. "We should force European governments to choose *between Paris and Washington," it states.
what because countries don't always agree with Bush, they should be threated like possible enemies, what kind of thinking is this, are they asking for an invasion of France.
Just to show you who the people are in Bush's innercircle "It may be assumed that their instincts at least are shared by hawks inside the government, whose twin power bases are the Pentagon's civilian leadership and the office of the vice-president, Dick Cheney"
if only they would have crashed their planes on these entities:
Project for the New American Century (PNAC) &
the Center for Security Policy
!!! I in no way think the actions on 9/11 were good !!!