View Single Post
Old 12-31-2003, 01:44 PM  
MattO
The O is for Oohhh
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUSTIN TEJAS
Posts: 10,861
iBook users agree: iBooks suck

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/34676.html

Dead iBook owners take protest to MacWorld show
By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
Posted: 30/12/2003 at 21:38 GMT

Faithful Apple users plan to put Quality Control issues center stage at the MacWorld show in San Francisco next week, to highlight a problem that Apple refuses to acknowledge.

iBook owners have been plagued by display problems and logic board failures this year, with over three hundred signing up for a potential class action suit.

Apple insists there are "no known problems" with the iBook, despite hundreds of incident reports to the contrary.And we can vouch for this from our own experience, as both of The Register's US iBooks have died this year, one after only ten weeks.

Reader analysis over at MacFixit suggests that both cheap shielding materials and basic mechanical design flaws are to blame.

"It seems Apple really needs to improve Quality Control and more stringent review of design issues. If I put out a product with these flaws I would expect to lose Quality Assurance Certification," writes one sleuth. Here's a discussion on Apple's own boards that the company hasn't deleted yet.

Apple overhauled the iBook range this Fall, with a revamped motherboard that supports the G4 processor and DDR memory. But failures persist.

Apple's quality control has suffered an annus horribilis in 2003. Poor design of the 15 inch aluminium PowerBook led to white stress spots appearing on many models, although Apple has at least acknowledged the problem. Of six PowerBooks sampled by MacWorld magazine, three had to be returned. The problems aren't simply confined to hardware. A catastrophic OS update, 10.2.8 was yanked after only a few hours after many users lost their networking. 10.3 Panther was rapidly updated to fix two severe bugs, one of which trashed data on some FireWire hard drives, while the other caused issues when using the encrypted home directory feature, FileVault. And a Bluetooth update in June which trashed users' address books could easily have been averted with a minimum of public beta testing. Opting for a closed, secretive testing program failed to detect the elementary bugs.


D'oh!
MattO is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote