Quote:
Originally posted by cluck
It'd be impossible to prove criminal intent on lensmans part. The problem would come in court when they bring up the records of pad admitting to being 17 and lensman not banning him.
If anything this makes more of a case for age verification which could be good or bad for the industry.
|
Yep.. If it is clearly stated that he is underage and is not removed, Lensman and anyone else associated with his continued presence can be legally liable. Just like if a minor enters the premesis of a bar or an adult store. If they are not immediately removed, the store/bar owners are then liable.