Quote:
Originally posted by monro
I smell something more in this. I have made a lot of testing to find out for myself what's going on and why as an example AFF can have the very same signup ratio for years...
AFF do not use ccbill
Three of my sponsors using ccbill do not pay my share when a customer has "high security" set.
One of my sponsors using ccbill pay whatever the cookie settings,
SexyAds in Australia. How can they do it?
IT CAN BE SOLVED!
I'm so tired of this "accepted" thefts going on.
First shaving and now this!
I'm so tired of all those here defending shaving and this small cuts by cookie settings.
Is there no honor left in the USA?? Small thefts like this should never be accepted by people in Western Europe or Australia.
|
Of course it can be solved. Simple changes CCBills end will make it possible for all affiliates to not have to rely on just cookies. ANYONE with half a clue in PHP etc can knock up something that does this anyway with the current system - it's not that difficult. Of course it then also means shaving is easier for those who want to do so hence my comment about a system that uses ccbill cookies AND dynamic tracking. Very easy to do if CCBill made a couple of changes.
Again for those who miss very basic points - most people DO NOT have ALL their cookies disabled if they have any at all disabled. Different security/privacy settings affect different cookies and most people only disable 3rd party cookies. You lose sales but it's not as high as many seem to think. Even so one lost sale is one too many.
What amazes me though is why people keep treating shit like this as something new. As with the ability to cap rebills it's been around for ages. Seems to me 90% of the people flogging porn spend their days running around with their heads either int he sand or up their arses. Either way they can't see out. But then people will continue to blame their own inability to sell on everything but themselves. It's far easier to look for excuses rather than to admit you're doing something wrong
