Quote:
Originally posted by broke
You did alright. 
But you seem to dismiss the fact that if 'daddy bush' had sent coalition forces to Baghdad in DS1 that an equal number of lives lost.
So it's bad because different troops are dying?
Please.
Of course, taking out Saddam doesn't end terrorism. News flash... neither does capturing 'bin ladden'.
You don't become adult.com without taking small steps towards your objective. Do you?
|
Post 666 for you... I'm scared lol
Sure lives woould have been lost... how can you go to war and not expect to loose lives. But if saddam is such a bad man, and we knew it.. he should have been taken out a long time ago and not allowed to stay in power.
As for bin ladden not ending terror... of course it will not end after his capture... but arn't you the least bit upset that this man is not being sought after with the same vengence as saddam was? I mean this man attacked us not once but twice on our own soil... has saddam done that?
Like I said above... the war on terror is like the war on drugs... it will be an ongoing battle throughout the existance of man. Where there is demand there will always be supply.