Quote:
Originally posted by Mutt
i haven't looked around MET in awhile but I have seen CHILDREN - not borderline girls - girls maybe 12 years old on their tour.
No doubt the photography qualifies as art but not for a moment would I accept that all models are 18+ just because some representative from the company said so. They have as much credibility as the AdultBouncer stooges who spout that company's bullshit 'We used to have some problems with stolen content but everything is totally legal now'.
I believe the content is art - I also believe at least half, probably more, of MET's members are pedophiles.
|
art? just throwing this out... ;)
hmmmm. In my time in school, and through all my Art History classes, nowhere did I ever study photos like this, nor have I ever been told by an art teacher that this is classified as art.
How come there are no museums full of this art?
Artistic photography?
try Dietter Appelt, but pics of nude children is not art man.
http://www.hainesgallery.com/DAPP.bio.html
I have helped organize Dieter exhibits, THAT is art, not naked kids.
