Quote:
Originally posted by Roger
How is it a dumb thing not to get involved? Finish the job? Sure, yeah  There are 5 more countries to invade and reasons need to be found to do so.
How about the US leaves the UN (an organisation that the US helped create) and create there own form of UN and establish there own laws. Oh, the problem is that some US allies won't follow those laws and then what will happen? Double standards again
Let me get this straight. Saddam does not have the right to kill those he perceives as his enemies, but the US does and should kill those perceived as enemies?
|
There are more countries that should be taken down...and unless they see the light...they will eventually be taken down.
I have little respect for the UN other than as a debating club but debate has its place so I reluctantly think the US should remain a member.
Right and wrong are relative...and mostly exists in idealism...but has little to do with reality. Saddam...as the leader of a nation...realistically speaking could kill whomever he perceives to be his enemy...and the cold hard reality is...he did this...because he had the power to do so...and it is the way of the human animal. Leaders of countries...through out history...have almost always done what they have the power to do...so there is nothing new about that. Having the power is the keyword...as the human animal still practices evolution's "survival of the fittest".