Quote:
Originally posted by funkmaster
... that is not the point, the point is who you target ... and this is what I dislike. in my eyes it is childporn, by the definition of law iti s not. my opinion obviously is not lensman' s opinion.
|
That really all depends. Even photographs of OBVIOUSLY legal women can be considered child pornography if the situation depicted is one which is obviously meant to portray her as a child or as underage. The definitions are getting a lot more general as authorities and lawmakers try harder and harder to crack down on CP. Depicting a model in a little schoolgirl outfit in a classroom might be ok, but if you write "Grade 5 class" on the chalkboard behind her, you can be charged with child porn. A lot of it is up to the interpretation of the community as well. Many people have made the mistake of thinking that just because the model is of age they are ok, and ended up spending a LONG time in jail for it.