Quote:
Originally posted by HarlotCash Dyker
I certainly agree many surfers have cookies disabled - But where do you get your figures from?
My own opinion - Less than thirty - Much less - However, yes, we programme owners do benefit this way.
I would not deny that.
To counteract that, we ssi all hits across our xits, 404's right down to our dump site, so affilates have better chances to sale somewhere on our sites -
We pay 65% or 30$ joins - Not one cent higher because it would be foolhardy to commit an unrealistic figur to rebilling that may never happen ($30 joins I am talking of)
65% will also remain the same - By the time you look at incurred costs such as hosted galleries, I am certain you would NOT even slightly dream of paying 70% yourself should you be running a programme)!!!
|
65% is not a bad figure either.. you're on of those that run a good ccbill show
My criticism is aimed at those trying to lure webmasters in with a 50% ccbill payout - ok, numbers fluctuate and results vary, but 30% of surfers having their cookies disabled or are blocking 3rd partie cookies and yadda yadda is not a far off number.