Yes yes, i know what you're thinking. Oh for fuck's sake, another PIBCash thread. But i think this minor oversight on Rconn's part is worth a look at. Not exactly conclusive, but things that make you go <i>hmmmm</i>.
This was taken from the PIB board:
http://hahahahahahahahaha.com/showth...threadid=12831
Quote:
|
The former employee had taken it upon themselves to copy the html code from the admin area before their dismissal. This made it very easy to add columns to the page and make it appear that there maybe something shitty going on with our reporting.
|
Now i'm sure you're thinking, so fucking what. He was obviously going to say something like that. But take note of "add columns." In PIB's defence, he showed a screenshot of how easy it would be to edit the html and make a realistic looking screenshot.
Here's the original image posted by jimmy:
<A HREF="http://www.chodadog.com/pibcash/fullscreenie.jpg" target="_blank"><IMG SRC=http://www.chodadog.com/pibcash/fullscreenie1.jpg></a>
And the image posted by Rconn to show how easy it was to change the html.
<A HREF="http://www.chodadog.com/pibcash/trueimage.jpg" target="_blank"><IMG SRC=http://www.chodadog.com/pibcash/trueimage1.jpg></a>
In case you still haven't noticed what i noticed, check out the number of columns in each. Didn't Rconn say that columns were added in the screenshot that jimmy had posted? Then why is it that his example (named "trueimage.jpg") has the same number of columns (14)? Wouldn't you expect to see the "true" number of columns with true column headings, or is it just me? Wouldn't the image have been more convincing if it had less columns, to further the point that columns had been added? To me, it's minor, but rather telling. Of course, like i already said.. it's hardly conclusive proof. Draw your own conclusions.