|
If all the images and cells have height and width attributes then
depending on the length it could be ok. However Netscape (not
sure about new versions) will still wait for the whole table to load
before rendering whereas IE will render the table as it
downloads. If the site can be broken into smaller parts then
that's a very good idea. If the designer is using WYSIWYG editor
then chances are they don't know how to do this without
creating a small gap from the editors transparent gif spacers. If
the tables are nested without spacer.gif's then they should be
able to be stacked exactly on top of each other without any gaps
and with more incremental and faster loading. If they are using
Dreamweaver then they'll need to set the export options so that
nested tables are used rather than spacer.gifs.
-Ben
__________________
Cyberwurx Hosting
After trying 5 different hosts, I found the best.
Since 1997 I've had 2 hours of downtime.
Fast support, great techs, no hype, no gimmicks.
<- I in no way endorse whatever just got stuck on the left of my post.
|