Quote:
Originally posted by Mike33
My mistake, it was a typo. I meant 1959, hence the 40 year reference.
Please don't focus on my intro paragraph. I really shouldn't have included it because I know most people will read it and dismiss the rest. The rest of what I wrote it is much more important.
|
you are right . . . with that incorrect lead in, combined with the long post following it, I skipped over it, figuring you did not know what you are talking about.
I wonder how many other typos are in there