View Single Post
Old 11-11-2003, 02:01 PM  
Mr. Jim
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,372
So I am clear...I too think the M-16 is need of being replaced. It is terrible in battlefield conditions. It is a very accurate weapon when propperly maintained. The 5.56 is designed to tumble through the body and cause severe damage.

The 7.62 round of the AK just blows you to bits. My point is that the M-16 in open terrain conditions can be very effective. if you even think dirt it will jam.

The 240 G is bad ass pice of gear 7.62 and has the same cyclic rate rate as the m249 saw.

This was the replacement for the M-60 E3
Mr. Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote