View Single Post
Old 11-06-2003, 03:26 PM  
woodman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally posted by sherie
Well I would certainly like to read this. There are instances where pregnancies have been terminated after the 3 month mark because they were necessary.


As for question about religion, we all know that GW has motives outside of saving babies past 3 months, he does not want abortion legal at all. And with this bill it's only a matter of time. Hell I didn't even know that they performed abortions past three months there...they don't here unless the mothers life is at risk etc.,
Not the AMA but it is from the director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers.


"When you're a doctor who does these abortions and the leaders of your movement appear before Congress and go on network news and say these procedures are done in only the most tragic of circumstances, how do you think that makes you feel? You know they're primarily done on healthy women and healthy fetuses, and it makes you feel like a dirty little abortionist with a dirty little secret. I think we should tell them the truth, let them vote and move on. In the vast majority of cases, the procedure is performed on a healthy mother with a healthy fetus that is 20 weeks or more along. The abortion-rights folks know it, the anti-abortion folks know it, and so, probably, does everyone else."

--Ron Fitzsimmons, Executive Director for the National Coalition of Abortion Providers The New York Times, February 26, 1997
woodman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote