|
Acacia could also just pick and choose which sponsors it wishes to settle with, and leavethem alone and go after the afiiliates (especially sponsors with a large affiliate base)
It really doesn't make sense to me about this whole contributory infringement issue..... the sponsors should be the targets... if they don't settle, it is absurd to hold the affiliate responsible.. afterall, they can just put the sponsor on notice, then should they fail to enter into negotiations, they then take the sponsor to court.
Instead, if the sponsor doesn't jump at signing the deal, they instead try to pick on easier targets.
Fight the Patent!
|