Quote:
Originally posted by Mutt
why is he doing this nonsense? webmasters don't have to prove anything and proving something 100% is impossible without hard evidence (video, fingerprints, eyewitness) so he's just being an ass cuz nobody can have that in this situation. Webmasters all over the place have arrived at the conclusion based on what info was on the Acacia letter for them and matching it against the info they have given to Matrix taking into consideration who else they might have given that info to. They have deduced Matrix was the source. But this ain't good enough for Norman.
Now stop this stupid shit - it's disingenuous and nobody is buying it. If Norman thinks he knows who took the list from Matrix, let everybody know. And if he knows what the fuck is he talking this gibberish about suing Acacia once he has 25 webmasters who can prove 100% that Matrix was the source?
What about suing the thief? Stealing is a far bigger crime than receiving stolen goods.
|
He cannot act against Acacia without proof that they in fact are using his database. He cannot act against a thief/disgruntled employee without proof. Conclusions reached by Webmasters does not constitute proof.
On the same show today it was stated that at least one person received his letter from Acacia via a processor database...as the processor was the only one that had some mispelled info...that was contained in the letter.