Quote:
Originally posted by chodadog
Guilty until proven innocent, huh? By the way, you don't seem to understand the difference between proof and evidence. I suggest you look up the definitions. I'd say it's proof that their database was used. I'd say that is beyond any doubt, <i>assuming</i> rich and jay's statements are true. That is all.
|
Now we're arguing semantics. The point is all the "evidence" points to one conclusion, no matter how you spin it. If no "evidence" is provided to counter that conclusion, then it is case closed. Here's an example. If Acacia takes you to court and you don't show up, which way will the court decide?