View Single Post
Old 10-29-2003, 12:42 AM  
darnit
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Teh Interweb
Posts: 2,439
"If that site doesn't have audio/video but sends traffic to a sponsor site that does have streaming media, but no license, then that site needs a license from Acacia. If that sponsor signs up with Acacia later on, then the affiliate does not have to pay royalties on the revenues received from the Acacia-licensed sponsor. "

so anything than links to a site that links to video is in violation? Thats three degrees of sepearation and on the web thats basically everyone in this biz.....wtf?

m no lawyer but i know that if i link to a site that has a link to another site that has celeb photos (or something else "unauthorized") im not responsible for distribution and these are extremely clear cut laws....

how is this valid for patent infringement if its not valid under every other treatment of the law?
darnit is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote