10-26-2003, 10:43 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Woodinville
Posts: 538
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KRL
Not to rain on the parade here, but from my experience it's always best to have your own attorney handle your own legal matters. As you can see above, you already have dissension issues and the thing hasn't even been formed.
Group representation can be extremely difficult to coordinate in a case like this where you have individuals grouping together from different states and different countries where there may be different legal statutes that are applicable unique to one party and not the others as a whole.
Its not a bad idea that choker came up with, but from the standpoint of maximizing your individual cases, you should also still consult with your own attorney.
Keep in mind also there are bad attorneys, good attorneys, and incredible attorneys that can make things happen to benefit you legally despite whatever laws are at issue. Those are typically the high priced ones that have judicial connections, solid networking with other major law firms, and just basically have the magic touch that can leave you wondering, how'd he pull that off for me.
Also, the law is all about interpretation. Keep that in mind always. One attorney will tell you one thing, and another will tell you something else in his opinion. You can have a dozen attorneys in a room looking at a case and they can all have different approaches, different angles to winning the case, different interpretations. There's rarely a right answer in the field of law. That's why a great lawyer is one who can take laws and skillfully twist and bend them in your favor without breaking them.
|
I agree with KRL's response. Judging from KRL's response, he appears to be one who has real business world experience and understands the importance of crossing the T's and dotting the I's while operating and defending your business.
Thank you KRL
__________________
An act of kindness is a wonderful gift
|
|
|