Quote:
Originally posted by Choker
No not at all. I am talking about getting a attorney to challenge Acacia's claim that any site linking to another site with movies on it is NOT IN VIOLATION of their license. In order for Acacia to prove this, well think about how stupid this would make them look. Think Acacia wants to explain to a jury why they go after joeblow who runs a 10k a day tgp instead of google? This would be a DISASTER for Acacia.
This is a loose loose situation for Acacia
1. If Acacia insists that tgps are in violation, they are fucked. This means every site on the web practically is in violation. Think any sane jury would rule in Acaci's favor if it went to trial?
2. If Acacia agrees that sites linking to other sites with movies on it them are not in violation, all free sites are off the hook and a MAJOR precendent is set for others to use in fighting their patent diputes with Acacia
|
Arghhhhhh!!!! man we should just talk so you can ask your attorney some key questions. Again your theory of logic is sound, but court rooms do not operate on logic.