Quote:
Originally posted by BRISK
Imagine if the US government had a video on its website, could Acacia then demand 2% of gross government revenue?
|
I wonder what they would answer to that lol...
"Ladies and Gentlemen, According to ACACIA's Claims of Owning the DMT Technology, every company using Such technology as "streaming" or "downloading" any form of video clip would be inclined to give 2% of the gross revenue away as a liscence.
According to our observations, The US Government has been using the DMT Technology for quite some time... Please take the time to analyse if 2% of 4,000+ Billion dollars every year for the past XX years since the debut of the patent is a rightful claim. Would 80 billions a year for a liscence fee make any sense to you at all? Now each of the defendants don't gross 4000+ billions a year... but the same reasoning stand."
LOL