Quote:
Originally posted by Far-L
Actually, it was the D$ show and if you remember, his definition of what an affiliate actually translates differently then your definition. He uses the "legal" definition of the term and unfortunately, under that guise, he is more than able to go after what we typify as "affiliates" because they are not true affiliates but actually independant marketers.
|
So the "legal" definition for affiliates encompasses our independent marketers aka affiliates? Other than affiliates ... what else can they go after?