Quote:
Originally posted by LadyMischief
They bought the patent from someone else in order to sue people and profit from it. What rock have you been hiding under that you've missed all the answers to those questions? They've been answered in at least 60 different threads in the last month that I can think of.
Unfortunately for Acacia, more and more prior art is popping up every day, and hopes are that it will render the patent invalid. However, until such a time, people are indeed responsible to acacia for percieved infringements of their patents.
|
Apparently a big rock.
Feel free to answer the questions.
Quote:
Originally posted by theking
If it has been posted...I have overlooked it...
1. Who specifically is challenging the patent?
2. What law firm is representing them?
3. Is the case currently being presented in Court?
4. If so what court...and what presiding judge?
5. If not when is a court date scheduled...before what court?
|