Quote:
Originally posted by theking
And question number 6.
Am I assuming correctly that at this point...a patent has been legally granted to Acacia...thus they currently hold what is presumed to be...under law...a legitmate patent?
|
They bought the patent from someone else in order to sue people and profit from it. What rock have you been hiding under that you've missed all the answers to those questions? They've been answered in at least 60 different threads in the last month that I can think of.
Unfortunately for Acacia, more and more prior art is popping up every day, and hopes are that it will render the patent invalid. However, until such a time, people are indeed responsible to acacia for percieved infringements of their patents.