Quote:
Originally posted by charly
To break Acacia and show the next bunch of lawyers we are not to be fooled with.All that is need is an effort by us to pay for it. Or do you want to go through this again?
|
I didn't make myself clear ...
what I meant was that step #1 would seem to me to get the patent overturned. To do that there is no need to use up legal fees in a court battle. The patent and trademark office will do this on their own when given proof of prior art. It's now a normal proceedure to have them reexamined.
I know this because I had a trademark granted, then revolked upon reexamination (in my case it wasn't prior art that killed it though, but the same process holds true)
THEN those involved can use the legal fees saved to smack Acacia up side the head in suits for recovery of damages etc ... and inturn show the secondary wolves we don't take things like this laying down!
I'm just trying to say that its unneccessary to do one thing in order to get BOTH accomplished .
I should add that if the legal eagles think its best to have it proven in court - then by all means, DO IT!
... boy I hope this made sense or someone will call me a blonde! Nevermind that I am LMAO