View Single Post
Old 10-06-2003, 03:07 PM  
Ken
Make more with us.
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally posted by FightThisPatent


Maybe more like they were served with letters from Acacia's attorney firm that stated the infringements... and there were several rounds of exchanges on definitions and charges. Unless of course you really meant that a court date was set and they were going to go to court, but before that court date, they settled.

This is where i get my definition for Litigation, where did you get yours?

Black's Law Dictionary (the accepted standard in the industry): Litigation, n. 1. The process of carrying on a lawsuit <the attorney advised his client to make a generous settlement offer in order to avoid litigation>. 2. A lawsuit itself <several litigations pending before the court>. -litigate, vb. -litigatory, litigational.

or

http://www.duhaime.org/dictionary/dict-l.htm


i understand that for most, this seems to be a silly issue of semantics, but the law is all about semantics, and putting twists and spins on issues is all about semantics..


Fight The Patent!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

No, they were not just served with letters. They were served with an actual lawsuit that they were required by law to respond to. That is litigation, anyway you slice it.
Ken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote