View Single Post
Old 10-06-2003, 02:14 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally posted by Ken



FightThisPatent,

That is also how we understand it, however as you said, this is all new territory. I can tell you one thing for sure, they won't be looking at our logs.

They won't need to be looking at your logs, they'll be looking at your quarterly and yearly financial statements.

I have to dive into semantics here... you wrote that Hustler and Vivid were in LITIGATION. So they were in court with Acacia? That's what LITIGATION means (i checked with an attorney as well as with the dictionary before i made this statement).

Maybe you meant to write, they were in DISCUSSIONS with Acacia on the licensing issues.

Any maybe the "fighting" was more like "heated discussions".

You also wrote they spent hundres of thousands of dollars on expenses.... maybe it was more like tens of thousands?

Also, that Hustler and Vivid couldn't partake in any activities to "fight" against them?????

THe answers don't matter.... the big players have settled, leaving the rest of the players to fend for themselves...afterall, why would anyone expect a competitor to want to stand up for other competitors.. oh wait, Larry did that before....i guess that's where people get that impression.


Fight The Patent!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957

Last edited by FightThisPatent; 10-06-2003 at 02:21 PM..
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote