View Single Post
Old 10-01-2003, 10:55 AM  
FATPad
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,693
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSaint
Its a stupid question, revisionist history notwithstanding.

My father, still living, was a fighter pilot in the navy and we have discussed this many times.

Fact: We were dying like flies on each island as we made our way to Japan, as many as 25,000 americans dead per island.

Fact: Invasion plans called for one million dead Japanese after we invaded the homeland (mostly civillians) and 100,000 or more additional dead Americans.

Fact: It was not well understood then that low level radiation was dangerous.

Fact: The nuke saved at least a million Japanese lives, and many Americans. Anyone with a brain would appreciate that another 2 years of war would not have been good for the Japanese, who refused to surrender even after the first atom bomb fell.
Well, it's not a stupid question. I see people continually mentioning the US using nukes on Japan as if everyone else had the chance to use a nuke first and refused out of some moral superiority.

So I figured I would ask.

btw, I agree with your answer.
__________________
<a href="http://www.adultcontent.co.uk">Adult Content UK - Great British Content</a>
FATPad is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote