Quote:
Originally posted by Choker
1. One program accused the TGP's sending traffic to galleries of having very poor traffic.
2. I posted a list of those sites.
3. The list included shemp.com
4. This guy was calling your traffic shit, not mine.
5. The intent was never to embaress the TGPS, but rather to have them help me defend YOUR OWN traffic.
As I stated before I think you misread my intentions. Here I am left holding the bag, having to defend all these TGP's traffic?? Someone accuses all these TGP's of having shit traffic, yet not a single one can come forward and defend THEIR OWN TRAFFIC?? I pay out thousands and thousands and not even one single TGP can back me up and defend their own Traffic? They were not calling MY TRAFFIC shit, they were CALLING EVERY TGP's TRAFFIC on that list SHIT. Not mine.
You felt I did you wrong Shemp? I feel you did me wrong. But all this could have been avoided by a simple phone call.
|
Thats way too general of an assumption on your part.
Are you saying every site on the list you posted has the same quality of traffic? For an alleged "detail" or "numbers" man, the list should have had the breakdown, by site, of how much traffic EACH site was sending to that program. That would have given me something to at least comment on.
As for the phone call, ya, you should have called me first.